![]() They will, however, fit in the Virginia Payload Module being built into the Block V Virginia submarines awarded last year. The emergence of hypersonic missiles has been a driving factor in the Navy’s desire to field a new large surface combatant since such weapons wont fit in the current vertical launch system cells on Burke-class destroyers and existing cruisers. A major driver in the difference between the CBO and Navy estimate was the cost of a future large surface combatant, according the Congressional Research Service. The Navy estimates it would need $22 billion annually in constant year 2019 dollars to execute its old shipbuilding plan, though the Congressional Budget Office put the estimate more than 30 percent higher. Smaller than a Zumwalt but packing some heat nonetheless.” Most of these feature a good sized gun on a relatively light chassis with good mobility (as a result, they are sometimes known as light tanks). I call it DDG Next to kind of right-size it. 6 Next of 7 LostCosmonaut Forum Nobility 4k LocationUpstate NY Posted FebruThis thread is for discussion of modern (including Cold War) tank destroyer and gun carrier concepts. “We put known systems that were reliable and were already fielded out in the fleet. “So think DDG-51 (that’s exactly what we did): We had a new hull but we put Aegis on it,” Gilday said.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |